Congratulations — you’re one step closer to better work.

You’ve uncovered where inefficiency hides. Now turn those insights into action.

Overall Score
0
out of 30
Drudgery Zone
Underwater
 

Delivered instantly and sent to your inbox.

  • Personalized results by department and process
  • ROI benchmarks to prove efficiency gains
  • Action steps to reduce time, cost, and errors
Operational Efficiency Zones

Underwater (Low Efficiency)

Score Range: 0-10

Work is fragmented and heavily manual. Tasks pile up, and teams spend more time
reacting than progressing.

Inconsistent

Score Range: 11-14

Some processes run smoothly while others break down. Results depend on workarounds, individual effort, and tribal knowledge.

Getting By

Score Range: 15 – 18

A basic foundation exists. Work moves forward, but friction appears in handoffs, repeated tasks, and unclear ownership.

Pretty Good

Score Range: 19–22

Processes are mostly integrated and predictable. Teams operate efficiently, with
occasional pockets of manual effort.

Harmonious (High Efficiency)

Score Range: 23 – 30

Operations are aligned and proactive. Manual work is rare, and teams can focus on
optimization rather than maintenance.

Where to Look First

Manual data entry — retyping test results, claims, or contact forms

Approval queues — simple decisions that take days to move

More process hotspots revealed in your full report

Why It Matters

Reducing a single high-drudgery workflow can cut processing time by up to 30%

Teams with low drudgery report 12% higher satisfaction

Industry-specific proof points available in your report.

Do This Next

Identify one process that crosses three or more teams

Your full action plan ranks the top five opportunities by ROI.

Instant access + a link for later